According to Hepworth and colleagues, what theory(ies) inform macro-level change?

• Periodical Listing
• HHS Writer Manuscripts
• PMC3248273

J Soc Piece of work Values Ideals. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 Dec 29.

Published in final edited grade as:

PMCID: PMC3248273

NIHMSID: NIHMS342711

Mental Health Stigma: Society, Individuals, and the Profession

Abstract

Mental wellness stigma operates in society, is internalized by individuals, and is attributed by wellness professionals. This ethics-laden upshot acts as a barrier to individuals who may seek or appoint in treatment services. The dimensions, theory, and epistemology of mental wellness stigma have several implications for the social piece of work profession.

Central Terms: Mental Health, Psychiatric Conditions, Stigma, Treatment Appointment, Social Work Ideals

1. Introduction

In 2001, the World Wellness System (WHO) reported that an estimated 25 percent of the worldwide population is afflicted by a mental or behavioral disorder at some time during their lives. This mental and behavioral health issue is believed to contribute to 12 per centum of the worldwide brunt of disease and is projected to increase to 15 percent by the year 2020 (Hugo, Boshoff, Traut, Zungu-Dirwayi, & Stein, 2003). Within the United States, mental and behavioral health weather condition bear upon approximately 57 million adults (National Constitute of Mental Wellness [NIMH], 2006). Despite the high prevalence of these conditions, recognized treatments take shown effectiveness in mitigating the problem and improving individual operation in society. Nonetheless, research suggests that (ane) individuals who are in need of care oft practice non seek services, and (two) those that brainstorm receiving care oftentimes practice not consummate the recommended treatment plan (Corrigan, 2004). For instance, information technology has been estimated that less than 40 percent of individuals with astringent mental illnesses receive consistent mental health treatment throughout the year (Kessler, Berglund, Bruce, Koch, Laska, Leaf, et al, 2001).

At that place are several potential reasons for why, given a high prevalence of mental health and drug use conditions, in that location is much less participation in treatment. Plausible explanations may include (one) that those with mental health or drug apply conditions are disabled plenty by their condition that they are not able to seek handling, or (two) that they are not able to place their own status and therefore exercise not seek needed services. Despite these viable options, there is another detail explanation that is evident throughout the literature. The U.Southward. Surgeon Full general (1999) and the WHO (2001) cite stigma as a key barrier to successful handling appointment, including seeking and sustaining participation in services. The problem of stigma is widespread, but it often manifests in several dissimilar forms. There are likewise varying ways in which it develops in society, which all take implications for social work – both macro and micro-focused practice.

In order to understand how stigma interferes in the lives of individuals with mental health and drug apply conditions, it is essential to examine electric current definitions, theory, and enquiry in this area. The definitions and dimensions of stigma are a basis for understanding the theory and epistemology of the three primary 'levels' of stigma (social stigma, self-stigma, and wellness professional stigma).

two. Stigma Definitions & Dimensions

The most established definition regarding stigma is written by Erving Goffman (1963) in his seminal work: Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Goffman (1963) states that stigma is "an attribute that is securely discrediting" that reduces someone "from a whole and usual person to a tainted, discounted i" (p. 3). The stigmatized, thus, are perceived as having a "spoiled identity" (Goffman, 1963, p. three). In the social work literature, Dudley (2000), working from Goffman's initial conceptualization, defined stigma as stereotypes or negative views attributed to a person or groups of people when their characteristics or behaviors are viewed as different from or junior to societal norms. Due to its use in social work literature, Dudley's (2000) definition provides an splendid stance from which to develop an understanding of stigma.

Information technology is important to recognize that most conceptualizations of stigma do not focus specifically on mental wellness or drug use disorders (e.yard., Crocker, Major, & Steele, 1998; Goffman, 1963). Stigma is relevant in other contexts such as towards individuals of varied backgrounds including race, gender, and sexual orientation. Thus, it is important to provide a definition of mental disorders, which besides include drug utilise disorders, then that it can be understood in relationship to stigma. While each mental wellness and drug use disorder has a precise definition, the often cited and widely used Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fourth Ed., Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR]; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2000) offers a specific definition of mental disorder which will be used to provide meaning to the concept. In this text, a mental disorder is a "clinically pregnant behavioral or psychological syndrome or design that occurs in an private and that is associated with present distress or disability or with a significantly increased hazard of suffering death, pain, disability, or an important loss of freedom," which results from "a manifestation of a behavioral, psychological, or biological dysfunction in the individual" (APA, 2000, p. xxxi). While this definition provides a consequent base from which to brainstorm understanding how stigma impacts individuals with mental health and drug utilise disorders, it is important to recognize the inherent danger in relying too heavily on specific mental wellness diagnoses as precise definitions (Corrigan, 2007), which is why the term is being used just as a basis for understanding in this context.

The next important stride is to empathise the constructs underlying the concept of stigma. These constructs detail the multiple pathways through which stigma can develop. Edifice from Goffman'south initial conceptualization, Jones and colleagues (1984) identified six dimensions of stigma. These include concealability, course, disruptiveness, peril, origin, and aesthetics (Feldman & Crandall, 2007; Jones et al, 1984). In addition, Corrigan and colleagues (2001; 2000) identified dimensions of stability, controllability, and pity. It is important to understand that these dimensions can either nowadays independently or simultaneously to create stigma. Further, stigma is more than a combination of these elements impacting each person as an individual, since stigma is believed to be mutual in the structural framework of club (Feldman & Crandall, 2007).

The first dimension of stigma is peril – otherwise known every bit dangerousness. Peril is often considered an important attribute in stigma development, and it is often cited in the inquiry literature (Corrigan, et al, 2001; Feldman & Crandall, 2007; Angermeyer & Matschinger, 1996). In this case, the general public perceives those with mental disorders as frightening, unpredictable, and strange (Lundberg, Hansson, Wentz, & Bjorkman, 2007). Corrigan (2004) also suggests that fear and discomfort ascend as a event of the social cues attributed to individuals. Social cues tin can exist evidenced by psychiatric symptoms, awkward concrete appearance or social-skills, and through labels (Corrigan, 2004; Link, Cullen, Frank, & Wozniak, 1987; Corrigan, 2007). This particular result highlights the dimension of aesthetics or the displeasing nature of mental disorders (Jones, et al, 1984). When society attributes, upon a person or group of people, perceived behaviors that do not adhere to the expected social norms, discomfort can exist created. This frequently leads to the generalization of the connectedness betwixt abnormal behavior and mental disease, which may result in labeling and avoidance. This as well may exist why club continues to avoid those with mental and behavioral disorders whenever possible (Corrigan, Markowitz, Watson, Rowan, & Kubiak, 2003).

Some other dimension of stigma that is frequently discussed in the research on stigma is origin. As in the definition provided before, mental and behavioral disorders are ofttimes believed to, at least in-part; develop from biological and genetic factors – i.e., origin (APA, 2000). This has direct implications for the dimension of controllability (Corrigan, et al, 2001). Within this dimension, it is often believed in order that mental and behavioral disorders are personally controllable and if individuals cannot get amend on their ain, they are seen to lack personal endeavour (Crocker, 1996), are blamed for their condition, and seen as personally responsible (Corrigan, et al, 2001).

A recent report past Feldman and Crandall (2007), establish that individuals with disorders such as pedophilia and cocaine dependence were much more stigmatized than those with disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder. This supports the controllability hypothesis in which pedophilia and cocaine dependence could be viewed as more controllable in society than a disorder believed to exist caused by a traumatic experience (PTSD). It also supports the pity dimension, in which disorders that are pitied to a greater degree are often less stigmatized (Corrigan, et al, 2000; Corrigan, et al, 2001). In this case, individuals inside a civilization or lodge may have more sympathy for disorders that are perceived as less controllable (Corrigan, et al, 2001).

Concealability, or visibility of the illness, is a dimension of stigma that parallels controllability, but as well provides other insight into the stigmatization of mental and behavioral disorders. Crocker (1996) suggests that stigmatized attributes such as race tin exist easily identified, and are less concealable, assuasive order to differentiate and stigmatize based on the visibility of the person. This is supported by enquiry that shows that order attributes more than stigmatizing stereotypes towards disorders such as schizophrenia, which by and large have more visible symptoms, compared to others such equally major depression (Angermeyer & Matschinger, 2005; Lundberg, et al, 2007).

The final three dimensions, class, stability, and disruptiveness, as well may have some similarities among each other and compared to the others presented. Course and stability question how likely the person with the disability is to recover and/or do good from treatment (Corrigan, et al, 2001; Jones, et al, 1984). Farther the disruptiveness dimension assesses how much a mental or behavioral disorder may bear upon relationships or success in guild. While disorders are often associated with an increased risk for poverty, lower socioeconomic status and lower levels of educational activity (Kohn, Dohrenwend, & Mirotznik, 1998), the stability and disruptiveness of the atmospheric condition have implications as to whether an individual will be able to hold down a successful job and engage in healthy relationships, as evidenced by differences in stigma based on social class status. This demonstrates that if disorders are less disruptive, in which case they may be perceived as more stable, they are as well less stigmatized (Corrigan, et al, 2001). This also expresses that some flexibility exists within each type of mental or behavioral disorder, as each diagnosed person is non stigmatized to the same extent (Crocker, 1999). Figure 1 depicts stigma equally a latent variable constructed from the dimensions discussed above.

3. Levels of Stigma: Theory & Epistemology

Illustrating the constructs underlying the formation of stigma helps us understand three specific levels of stigma – social stigma, self-stigma, and professional stigma. In this context, 'levels' does not refer to a hierarchy of importance for these varied stigmas, merely rather to represent unlike social fields of stigma that tin can be differentiated from each other. In improver, further definition and theory behind these three 'levels' of stigma must be presented. Kickoff, stigmatized attitudes and beliefs towards individuals with mental health and drug utilize disorders are often in the form of social stigma, which is structural within the general public. 2d, social stigma, or even the perception that social stigma exists, can become internalized by a person resulting in what is ofttimes chosen cocky-stigma. Finally, another, less studied level of stigma is that which is held amidst health professionals toward their clients. Since health professionals are function of the general public, their attitudes may in role reflect social stigma; nevertheless, their unique roles and responsibility to 'help' may create a specific barrier. The following theories are presented equally an aid to understanding how each 'level' of stigma may develop in society.

Social Stigma

The first, and most frequently discussed, 'level' is social stigma. Social stigma is structural in society and can create barriers for persons with a mental or behavioral disorder. Structural means that stigma is a conventionalities held by a big faction of guild in which persons with the stigmatized status are less equal or are role of an inferior group. In this context, stigma is embedded in the social framework to create inferiority. This conventionalities system may outcome in unequal admission to handling services or the creation of policies that unduly and differentially bear on the population. Social stigma tin can likewise cause disparities in admission to basic services and needs such equally renting an apartment.

Several distinct schools of thought have contributed to the understanding of how social stigma develops and plays out in society. Unfortunately, to this point, social piece of work has offered express contributions to this literature. Nonetheless, ane of the leading disciplines of stigma inquiry has been social psychology. Stigma development in almost social psychology research focuses on social identity resulting from cognitive, behavioral, and melancholia processes (Yang, Kleinman, Link, Phelan, Lee, & Good, 2007). Researchers in social psychology often advise that at that place are three specific models of public stigmatization. These include socio-cultural, motivational, and social cognitive models (Crocker & Lutsky, 1986; Corrigan, 1998; Corrigan, et al, 2001). The socio-cultural model suggests that stigma develops to justify social injustices (Crocker & Lutsky, 1986). For instance, this may occur as a way for guild to identify and label individuals with mental and behavioral illnesses equally diff. Second, the motivational model focuses on the bones psychological needs of individuals (Crocker & Lutsky, 1986). One example of this model may exist that since persons with mental and behavioral disorders are ofttimes in lower socio-economical groups, they are inferior. Finally, the social cognitive model attempts to make sense of basic society using a cognitive framework (Corrigan, 1998), such that a person with a mental disorder would be labeled in one category and differentiated from non-sick persons.

Most psychologists including Corrigan and colleagues (2001) prefer the social cognitive model to explicate and understand the concept of stigma. One such understanding of this perspective – Attribution Theory – is related to three specific dimensions of stigma including stability, controllability, and pity (Corrigan, et al, 2001) that were discussed earlier. Using this framework, a contempo study by these researchers institute that the public ofttimes stigmatizes mental and behavioral disorders to a greater degree than physical disorders. In addition, this enquiry plant stigma variability based on the public's "attributions." For example, cocaine dependence was perceived as the nigh controllable whereas 'mental retardation' was seen as least stable and both therefore received the most astringent ratings in their corresponding stigma category (Corrigan, et al, 2001). These findings suggest that combinations of attributions may signify varying levels of stigmatized beliefs.

Sociologists take also heavily contributed to the stigma literature. These theories have generally been seen through the lens of social interaction and social regard. The commencement of these theorists was Goffman (1963) who believed that individuals move between more than or less 'stigmatized' categories depending on their knowledge and disclosure of their stigmatizing status. These socially constructed categories parallel Lemert'south (2000) discussion on social reaction theory. In this theory, two social categories of deviance are created including primary deviance, believing that people with mental and behavioral disorders are not acting within the norms of lodge, and secondary deviance, deviance that develops afterwards society stigmatizes a person or grouping. Similarly, research demonstrating that college levels of stigmatization are attributed towards individuals with more "severe" disorders (Angermeyer & Matschinger, 2005) besides resembles these hierarchical categories and the disruptiveness and stability dimensions of stigma.

Furthermore, Link and Phelan conspicuously illustrated the view of sociology towards stigma in their article titled Conceptualizing Stigma (2001). Link and Phelan (2001) argue that stigma is the co-occurrence of several components including labeling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination. Showtime, labeling develops every bit a result of a social choice process to determine which differences matter in lodge. Differences such as race are hands identifiable and allow society to categorize people into groups. The aforementioned scenario may occur when lodge reacts to the untreated outward symptoms of several severe mental illnesses; i.e., Schizophrenia. Labels connect a person, or group of people, to a set of undesirable characteristics, which tin can then be stereotyped. This labeling and stereotyping process gives ascent to separation. Order does not desire to be associated with unattractive characteristics and thus hierarchical categories are created. Once these categories develop, the groups who have the nearly undesirable characteristics may go victims of status loss and discrimination. The unabridged process is accompanied by significant embarrassment by the individuals themselves and by those associated with them (Link & Phelan, 2001).

While social psychology and folklore are the master contributors to the stigma literature, other disciplines have provided insight every bit well. Communications, Anthropology, and Ethnography all favor theories that revolve effectually threat. In Communications literature, stigma is the result of an "united states of america versus them" approach (Brashers, 2008). For example, the use of specific in-grouping language tin can reinforce in-group belongingness likewise as promote out-group differentiation (Brashers, 2008). This is referenced in research on peer group relationships such that youth frequently rate interactions with their same-age peers more positively than with older adults (whether family members or not) (Giles, Noels, Williams, Ota, Lim, Ng, et. al., 2003). This can as well exist applied to those with mental disorders in that individuals in the out-grouping (mental disorders) are perceived less favorably than the non-ill in-group.

Anthropology and Ethnography besides prefer the identity model. From this perspective, the focus is on the impact of stigma within the lived experience of each person. Stigma may touch on persons with mental illnesses through their social network, including how it exists in the structures of lived experiences such as employment, relationships, and condition. Further, the impact of stigma is a response to threat, which may be a natural or tactical self-preservation strategy. Yet, it only worsens the suffering of the stigmatized person (Yang, et al, 2007). It is important to annotation once more that while many disciplines have been leaders in social stigma theory, social work-specific literature has been generally void of give-and-take on this topic. This is especially unusual, since stigma is an obvious gene that impacts the lives of social work clients on a daily footing.

Cocky-Stigma

Crocker (1999) demonstrates that stigma is not but held among others in society but can as well be internalized by the person with the status. Thus, the continued impact of social/public stigma can influence an private to feel guilty and inadequate about his or her condition (Corrigan, 2004). In addition, the commonage representations of pregnant in society – including shared values, behavior, and ideologies – can act in place of direct public/social stigma in these situations (Crocker & Quinn, 2002). These collective representations include historical, political, and economical factors (Corrigan, Markowitz, and Watson, 2004). Thus, in self-stigma, the knowledge that stigma is present within society, can accept an affect on an individual fifty-fifty if that person has not been directly stigmatized. This impact can accept a deleterious issue on a person'south self-esteem and cocky-efficacy, which may lead to altered behavioral presentation (Corrigan, 2007). Nevertheless, Crocker (1999) highlights that individuals are able to internalize stigma differently based on their given situations. This suggests that personal cocky-esteem may or may non be every bit affected by stigma depending on individual coping mechanisms (Crocker & Major, 1989).

Similarly, other theories accept provided insight into the idea of self-stigma. In modified labeling theory, the expectations of condign stigmatized, in addition to really being stigmatized, are factors that influence psychosocial well-existence (Link, Cullen, Struening, Shrout, & Dohrenwend, 1989). In this context, information technology is primarily the fear of being labeled that causes the individual to experience stigmatized. Similarly, Weiner (1995) proposed that stigmatized beliefs provoke an emotional response. This can be interpreted from the standpoint of the affected individual, such that he or she may feel stigmatized and reply emotionally with embarrassment, isolation, or anger.

Health Professional Stigma

It may seem unlikely that social workers and other health professionals would deport stigmatized beliefs towards clients; peculiarly those whom they know are afflicted by a variety of barriers to handling engagement. Withal, recent literature is beginning to document the initial touch of health professional person stigma (Nordt, Rössler, & Lauber, 2006; Volmer, Mäesalu, & Bell, 2008). While limited evidence exists specifically on social worker attitudes, chemist's students who desire more social distance towards individuals with Schizophrenia are also less willing to provide them medications counseling (Volmer, et al, 2008). In add-on, one Swiss study (psychiatrists, nurses, and psychologists) found that mental health professionals did non differ from the general public on their desired social distance from individuals with mental health conditions (Nordt, et al, 2006). Other studies have also come to similar conclusions (Lauber, et al, 2006; Tsao, Tummala, & Roberts, 2008; Sriram & Jabbarpour, 2005; Ücok, Polat, Sartorius, Erkoc, & Atakli, 2004). Clients have also reported feeling 'labeled' and 'marginalized' past health professionals (Liggins & Hatcher, 2005). Individuals with mental illnesses may not even receive equivalent care (compared to non-mentally sick patients) in general health settings once health professionals become enlightened of their mental wellness conditions (Desai, Rosenheck, Druss, & Perlin, 2002).

Theory on health professional stigma is very limited, but some literature does provide insight into its possible evolution. In one way, stigma by health professionals may develop very much the same equally the social stigma axiomatic in the full general public. Social workers may develop their own biases from their upbringing or fifty-fifty from burnout in their own working roles, particularly when working with individuals who accept severe and persistent mental illnesses (Acker & Lawrence, 2009). Nonetheless, some indications suggest that health professional stigma may also develop in a unique way. For example, social workers and other wellness professionals, like to persons in the general public, experience their own mental health and drug use problems and ofttimes have friends or family members who feel these same issues (Siebert, 2004; Fewell, Male monarch, & Weinstein, 1993). Individuals may also cocky-select into a helping profession due in part to these experiences (Stanley, Manthorpe, & White, 2007). When social workers and other health professionals deal with mental health and drug apply problems they may experience exhaustion and/or become more or less likely to recognize similar problems among their clients (Siebert, 2003). Some research suggests that mental health atmospheric condition are more than prevalent among helping professionals than in the general public (Schemhammer, 2005). This problem has also been shown to impair professional social work practice behaviors (Siebert, 2004; Sherman, 1996). For example, Siebert (2003) found that social workers who used marijuana were less likely to recognize marijuana utilise as a trouble amidst their clients.

The counter-transference that tin can develop as a issue of personal experiences or behaviors may impact clients who may exist vulnerable when participating in handling and may not take the advisable resources to determine when they are non beingness treated adequately (Siebert, 2004; Hepworth, Rooney, & Larsen, 2002; Rayner, Allen, & Johnson, 2005). Clients may also be disenfranchised by the treatment process and become more likely to end current treatment and less likely to seek treatment in the future. This creates a barrier to the overall well-being of individuals past preventing adequate handling, but it as well may impact the acknowledgement of their disorder. Overall, health professionals may non provide adequate intervention, early detection, or community referral options for individuals with mental or behavioral disorders (Gassman, Demone, & Albilal, 2001; Tam, Schmidt, & Weisner, 1996), because of their own stigmatizing behavior and personal histories (Siebert, 2004; 2005).

4. Implications for Social Work

While it is apparent that stigma (all three levels) impacts individuals' lives, at that place are besides several implications for stigma and health professionals. These implications are placed into context within social work practise, pedagogy, policy, and inquiry. In do, social workers brand up between 60–70 percentage of mental health professionals in the Us (Proctor, 2004). While their roles may vary in different countries, they can nonetheless be important participants in mitigating stigma across the globe. Since social workers often provide gatekeeping and triage functions in their roles, they are amid the start to exist in contact with individuals with psychiatric conditions (Hall, et al, 2000). Their attitudes and treatment preferences in practice settings tin thus either promote or disenfranchise treatment seeking among their clients.

Social workers may be able to accost issues of stigma within themselves past recognizing and embracing values and personal biases. This may be a difficult transformation that requires significant personal work and/or therapy. They may also be able to piece of work with their clients on bug of stigma through their treatment provisions, triage roles, and outreach efforts. Nevertheless, the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Code of Ideals mandates that professionals promote self-decision, client rights, self-realization, empowerment, social justice, and the nobility and worth of every person (National Association of Social Workers [NASW], 1999). These specific professional values pointedly call social workers to work to mitigate their own levels of stigma and work with others to dispel levels of social stigma and self-stigma.

While social workers have the opportunity to work with individuals, they too work with families. 1 additional way social workers may seek to mitigate social stigma on a micro-level is via the family. Family therapy may help relatives understand psychiatric atmospheric condition and how they can assist/support the affected individual (Lefley, 1989). Some research suggests that more attention to families of individuals with mental health weather condition is needed (Thornicroft, Brohan, Kassam, & Lewis-Holmes, 2008). If social workers are able to support an individual's support organisation (family unit), information technology may help meliorate treatment seeking and treatment appointment for that person. Several studies have demonstrated the positive impact betwixt family interventions and treatment engagement by the afflicted individual (Copello, Velleman, & Templeton, 2005; Adeponle, Thombs, Adelekan, & Kirmayer, 2009; Glynn, Cohen, Dixon & Niv, 2006). While this does not supplant group piece of work or individual piece of work with a detail customer, families may be among the well-nigh stigmatizing groups towards the affected person (Lee, Lee, Chiu, & Kleinman, 2005), and improved efforts towards the family organisation may exist helpful.

On a macro level, social workers tin can besides exist instrumental in leading larger targeted educational efforts aimed at reducing stigma. Targeted programs have shown effectiveness in challenging misconceptions, improving attitudes, and reducing social altitude (Thornton &Wahl, 1996; Esters, et al, 1998; Corrigan, et al, 2001). One such plan, lead by the network of the World Psychiatric Association, has focused on individuals that touch on the larger structural attitudes of stigma such as medical personnel, police force officers, and journalists (Thornicroft, et al, 2008s). Large macro-level stigma campaigns that can be facilitated by social workers include public advertisements, targeted educational efforts, and advancement for agency modify. Occasionally, other systematic changes need to accompany these targeted efforts (Pinfold, Huxley, Thornicroft, Farmer, Toulmin, & Graham, 2003), just they accept shown effectiveness and are important in mitigating stigma around the globe. Withal, more interventions and strategies must be adult to mitigate stigma in society.

Another important way to impact stigma is by educating individuals that have an opportunity to brand a difference – i.e., social work education. For instance, when individuals take contact with those with mental illnesses, stigma can be diminished (Corrigan, et al, 2001). This may be the result of stereotypical beliefs near psychiatric conditions that are consequent with dimensions of stigma such as dangerousness or aesthetics (see, Jones, et al, 1984). Exposing social workers to these population groups may increase their willingness to care for the afflicted clients. This can exist implemented through the field practicum experience at the undergraduate and graduate level. Teaching on stigma likewise fits into the exercise sequences (macro- and micro- level), elective courses on substance corruption, and clinical diagnosis and assessment courses. Still, Bina and colleagues (2008) plant that improving the knowledge and pedagogy of social workers virtually clients with drug use conditions will increase their interest in working with that population in do. Furthermore, social work educational inquiry has demonstrated that preparation social workers improves the likelihood that they will arbitrate, assess, and provide treatment for persons in an afflicted population, seek employment in that expanse, and feel confident and competent about their piece of work (Amodeo, 2000).

Stigma is a global issue, and efforts to mitigate stigma through policy may be another effective strategy. On the macro-level, social workers tin can be very influential in advocating for policy change. Corrigan and colleagues (2001) suggest that policy change is one of the three strategies to mitigate stigma in society. For instance, stigma may touch on lawmakers and permeate throughout government. One of the almost important reasons why mental wellness intendance is not adequate is due to a lack of resources. In this case, it appears that economical factors may play a role in admission to treatment. Nonetheless, there is also a low priority placed on mental wellness inside government and other funding bodies to back up services (Knapp, Funk, Curran, Prince, Grigg, & McDaid, 2006). The WHO (2003) showed that while neuropsychiatric conditions make up thirteen percent of the global burden of disease, only a median 2 percent of health care budgets in countries around the world are appropriated for mental illness. The lack of governmental back up combined with the lack of support from other funding bodies (insurance companies) can in part be attributed to stigma (Knapp, et al, 2006). The debate about mental health parity in the United States is some other case. Insurance companies in the U.S. have traditionally not funded mental health treatment to the same degree as full general physical health illnesses (U.S. Surgeon General, 1999), which promotes that devaluation of mental affliction in society. These disparate policies also act as a barrier to affected individuals and their power to admission social work services. Social workers and other policy makers can advocate for alter in lodge. Social workers can exist specifically instrumental in this process every bit they frequently serve disadvantaged populations such every bit those with mental illnesses, and should work to assist with the needs of their clients.

Social workers, as social scientists, are in position to develop research programs that seek to understand and influence stigma. More research is needed to empathize the impact of different cultural traditions, attitudes, values, and beliefs on stigma, as it may vary between and within countries. This is besides true amid wellness professionals and their attitudes towards treating individuals in their customs. As social scientists that practice and acquit research with different customer populations, social workers have the ability to mensurate stigma amidst not but different race/ethnicity groups, but also in relation to individuals' sexual orientation, gender, and age. In addition, limited research has specifically addressed the dimensions of stigma equally discussed in the theoretical literature (Corrigan, et al, 2000; Jones, et al, 1984). More precise measures are needed to adequately assess stigma, across its varying dimensions and levels. The use of current stigma-related measures such equally the Psychiatric Disability Attribution Questionnaire (Corrigan, et al, 2001) and the development of alternative scales to measure health professional person stigma are needed to address dimensions of stigma across all three levels simultaneously. Also, larger studies of health professional person stigma are needed, to sympathize how the attitudes of health professionals, and specifically social workers, influence handling engagement and access.

5. Conclusions

Mental wellness weather condition are pervasive around the world. In addition, the burden of these weather condition is expected to abound over the next 20 years (Mathers & Loncar, 2006). Unfortunately, few individuals receive the psychiatric treatment they need, as individuals often practice not seek services and frequently do not remain in care one time they begin. The WHO (2001) has suggested that stigma is one of the largest barriers to treatment engagement, even though treatment has shown to exist effective, even in low income countries (Patel, et al, 2007). While stigma remains evident in society, within individuals themselves, and among health professionals, the ethical problem of health professional stigma places an additional barrier on clients who seek needed mental health services.

Acknowledgments

This piece of work was partially supported by a National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) Institutional Training Laurels Grant (T32DA021129). The content in this manuscript is the sole responsibleness of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIDA.

Footnotes

This text may be freely shared among individuals, but it may not be republished in any medium without express written consent from the authors and advance notification of White Chapeau Communications

References

• Acker GM, Lawrence D. Social work and managed intendance. Periodical of Social Work. 2009;9(iii):269–283. [Google Scholar]
• Adeponle AB, Thombs BD, Adelekan ML, Kirmayer LJ. Family participation in handling, mail-discharge appointment and medication adherence at a Nigerian psychiatric hospital. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;194:86–87. [PMC gratuitous commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• American Psychiatric Clan. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed., Text Revision) Washington, D.C: Author; 2000. [Google Scholar]
• Amodeo Yard. The therapeutic attitudes and behavior of social work clinicians with and without substance corruption training. Substance Use Misuse. 2000;35(xi):1507–1536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H. Accept their been any changes in the public's attitudes towards psychiatric treatment? Results from representative population surveys in Germany in the years 1990 and 2001. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2005;111(1):68–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H. The effect of violent attacks by schizophrenic persons on the attitude of the public towards the mentally ill. Social Science & Medicine. 1996;43:1721–1728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Bina R, Harnek-Hall DM, Mollette A, Smith-Osbourne A, Yum J, Sowbel 50, et al. Substance corruption training and perceived knowledge: predictors of perceived preparedness to piece of work in substance abuse. Journal of Social Work Didactics. 2008;44(three):7–20. [Google Scholar]
• Brashers D. Marginality, Stigma, and Communication. In: Donsbach W, editor. The International Encyclopedia of Advice. Blackwell Publishing; 2008. Retrieved on Nov eighteen, 2008, from Blackwell Reference Online: http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405131995_chunk_g978140513199518_ss6-one. [Google Scholar]
• Copello AG, Velleman RDB, Templeton LJ. Family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug issues. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2005;24:369–385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Corrigan Pow. The affect of stigma on severe mental affliction. Cerebral and Behavioral Practice. 1998;five:201–222. [Google Scholar]
• Corrigan PW. How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist. 2004;50(7):614–625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Corrigan PW. How clinical diagnosis might exacerbate the stigma of mental illness. Social Piece of work. 2007;52(1):31–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Corrigan Pw, Markowitz Fe, Watson AC. Structural levels of mental affliction stigma and bigotry. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2004;30:481–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Corrigan P, Markowitz F, Watson A, Rowan D, Kubiak MA. An attribution model of public discrimination towards persons with mental illness. Journal of Health Behavior. 2003;44(ii):162–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Corrigan PW, River LP, Lundin RK, Penn DL, Uphoff-Wasowski Yard, Campion J, et al. 3 strategies for irresolute attributions about severe mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2001;27(2):187–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Corrigan PW, River LP, Lundin RK, Wasowski KU, Campion J, Mathisen J, et al. Stigmatizing attributions virtually mental illness. Journal of Community Psychology. 2000;28(1):91–102. [Google Scholar]
• Crocker J. Stigma. In: Antony SR, Hewstone M, editors. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. Blackwell Publishing; 1996. Retrieved November 18, 2008 from Blackwell Reference Online: http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9780631202899_chunk_g978063120289921_ss1-54. [Google Scholar]
• Crocker J. Social stigma and self-esteem: Situational construction of self-worth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1999;35:89–107. [Google Scholar]
• Crocker J, Lutsky N. Stigma and the dynamics of social cognition. In: Ainlay SC, Becker G, Coleman LM, editors. The dilemma of difference: A multidisciplinary view of stigma. New York: Plenum Press; 1986. [Google Scholar]
• Crocker J, Major B. Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review. 1989;96:608–630. [Google Scholar]
• Crocker J, Major B, Steele C. Social stigma. In: Fiske South, Gilbert D, Lindzey M, editors. Handbook of social psychology. Boston: McGraw-Loma; 1998. [Google Scholar]
• Crocker J, Quinn DM. Psychological Consequences of Devalued Identities. In: Brown R, Gaertner Southward, editors. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes. Blackwell Publishing; 2002. Retrieved from Blackwell Reference Online on Nov xviii, 2008 from http://world wide web.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405106542_chunk_g978140510654214. [Google Scholar]
• Desai MM, Rosenheck RA, Druss BG, Perlin JB. Mental disorders and quality of diabetes intendance in the Veterans Health Assistants. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;159(9):1584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Dudley JR. Against stigma inside the services system. Social Work. 2000;45:449–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Esters LG, Cooker PG, Ittenbach RF. Effects of a unit of measurement of instruction in mental health on rural adolescents' conceptions of mental illness and attitudes about seeking assist. Adolescence. 1998;33:469–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Feldman DB, Crandall CS. Dimensions of mental illness stigma: What well-nigh mental disease causes social rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2007;26(2):137–154. [Google Scholar]
• Fewell CH, King BL, Weinstein DL. Alcohol and other drug use amid social work colleagues and their families: Touch on practice. Social Work. 1993;38:565–570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Gassman RA, Demone HW, Albilal R. Alcohol and other drug content in core courses: Encouraging substance abuse assessment. Periodical of Social Work Didactics. 2001;37(1):137–145. [Google Scholar]
• Giles H, Noels KA, Williams A, Ota H, Lim T, Ng SH, et al. Intergenerational communication beyond cultures: Young people'southward perceptions of conversations with family unit elders, non-family elders, and same-age peers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. 2003;18:32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Glynn SM, Cohen AN, Dixon LB, Niv N. The potential impact of the recovery movement on family interventions for Schizophrenia: Opportunities and obstacles. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2006;32(3):451–463. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall; 1963. [Google Scholar]
• Hall MN, Amodeo One thousand, Shaffer HJ, Vander Bilt J. Social workers employed in substance abuse handling agencies: A grooming needs assessment. Social Work. 2000;45(2):141–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Hepworth DH, Rooney RH, Larsen J. Directly social piece of work practice: Theory and skills. 6th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole; 2002. [Google Scholar]
• Hugo CJ, Boshoff DEL, Traut A, Zungu-Dirwayi N, Stein DJ. Community attitudes toward and noesis of mental illness in Due south Africa. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2003;38:715–719. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Jones EE, Farina A, Hastorf AH, Markus H, Miller DT, Scott RA. Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York: Freeman; 1984. [Google Scholar]
• Kessler RC, Berglund PA, Bruce ML, Koch R, Laska EM, Leaf PJ, et al. The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental disease. Health Services Inquiry. 2001;36:987–1007. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Knapp M, Funk Chiliad, Curran C, Prince G, Grigg One thousand, McDaid D. Economic barriers to meliorate mental health exercise and policy. Wellness Policy and Planning. 2006;21(3):157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Kohn R, Dohrenwend BP, Mirotznik J. Epidemiologic findings on selected psychiatric disorders in the general population. In: Dohrenwend BP, editor. Adversity, Stress, and Psychopathology. New York, NY: Oxford University Printing; 1998. pp. 235–284. [Google Scholar]
• Lauber C, Nordt C, Braunschweig C, Rössler West. Exercise mental health professionals stigmatize their patients. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2006;113:51–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Lee S, Lee MTY, Chiu MYL, Kleinman A. Experience of social stigma by people schizophrenia in Hong Kong. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2005;186:153–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Lefley HP. Family burden and family stigma in major mental disease. American Psychologist. 1989;44(three):556–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Lemert Eastward. How we got where we are: An informal history of the study of deviance. In: Lemert C, Winter Yard, editors. Criminal offense and deviance: Essays and innovations of Edwin. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2000. [Google Scholar]
• Liggins J, Hatcher South. Stigma toward the mentally sick in the general hospital: a qualitative study. General Infirmary Psychiatry. 2005;27(v):359–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Link BG, Cullen FT, Frank J, Wozniak JF. The social rejection of former mental patients: Understanding why labels thing. American Periodical of Sociology. 1987;92:1461–1500. [Google Scholar]
• Link BG, Cullen FT, Struening EL, Shrout PE, Dohrenwend BP. A modified labeling theory arroyo in the area of mental disorders: An empirical cess. American Sociological Review. 1989;54:100–123. [Google Scholar]
• Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27:363–385. [Google Scholar]
• Lundberg B, Hansson 50, Wentz Eastward, Bjorkman T. Sociodemographic and clinical factors related to devaluation/discrimination and rejection experiences among users of mental wellness services. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2007;42:295–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3(xi):e442. [PMC complimentary commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• National Association of Social Workers. Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. DC: Author; 1999. [Google Scholar]
• National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH] The Numbers Count: Mental Disorders in America. 2006 Retrieved on June 18, 2010 from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/publicat/numbers.cfm#Intro.
• Nordt C, Rössler W, Lauber C. Attitudes of mental health professionals toward people with Schizophrenia and Major Depression. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2006;32(iv):709. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Patel V, Araya R, Chatterjee Due south, Chisholm D, Cohen A, De Silva M, et al. Treatment and prevention of mental disorders in low-income and centre-income countries. The Lancet. 2007;370(9591):991–1005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Pinfold V, Huxley P, Thornicroft G, Farmer P, Toulmin H, Graham T. Reducing psychiatric stigma and bigotry: Evaluating an educational intervention with the policy force in England. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2003;38:337–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Proctor EK. Inquiry to inform mental wellness practice: Social work's contribution. Social Piece of work Inquiry. 2004;28:195–197. [Google Scholar]
• Rayner GC, Allen SL, Johnson M. Countertransference and self-injury: A cognitive-behavioural cycle. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;50(1):12–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Schemhammer E. Taking their own lives – The loftier rate of physician suicide. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(24):2473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Sherman Doc. Distress and professional impairment due to mental health problems amidst psychotherapists. Clinical Psychology Review. 1996;16(4):299–315. [Google Scholar]
• Siebert DC. Denial of AOD use: An event for social workers and the profession. Health and Social Work. 2003;28(2):89–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Siebert DC. Low in Due north Carolina social workers: Implications for practice and enquiry. Social Piece of work Research. 2004;28(1):30–twoscore. [Google Scholar]
• Siebert DC. Help seeking for AOD misuse among social workers: Patterns, barriers, and implications. Social Work. 2005;50(1):65–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Sriram TG, Jabbarpour YM. Are mental health professionals immune to stigmatizing beliefs? Psychiatric Services. 2005;56:610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Stanley N, Manthorpe J, White M. Depression in the profession: Social workers� experiences and perceptions. British Journal of Social Work. 2007;37:281–298. [Google Scholar]
• Tam TW, Schmidt Fifty, Weisner C. Patterns in the institutional encounters of problem drinkers in a customs human services network. Addiction. 1996;91(5):657–670. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Thornicroft Chiliad, Brohan East, Kassam A, Lewis-Holmes E. Reducing stigma and discrimination: Candidate interventions. International Journal of Mental Health Systems. 2008;2:3. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Thornton JA, Wahl OF. Impact of a paper article on attitudes toward mental illness. Journal of Customs Psychology. 1996;24:17–24. [Google Scholar]
• Tsao CIP, Tummala A, Roberts LW. Stigma in mental health intendance. Academic Psychiatry. 2008;32(2):lxx. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Ücok A, Polat A, Sartorius Due north, Erkoc S, Atakli C. Attitudes of psychiatrists towards patients with Schizophrenia. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2004;58:89–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• U.Southward. Surgeon General. Rockville, Maryland: Middle of Mental Wellness Services, National Institute of Mental Health; 1999. Mental health: A report of the U.S. Surgeon Full general. [Google Scholar]
• Volmer D, Mäesalu One thousand, Bong JS. Pharmacy students' attitudes toward and professional interactions with people with mental disorders. International Periodical of Social Psychiatry. 2008;54(five):402–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Weiner B. Judgements of Responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
• World Health Arrangement [WHO] Investing in mental wellness. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003. [Google Scholar]
• World Health Organization, WHO. World Health Report 2001. Mental wellness: new understanding, new promise. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland; 2001. [Google Scholar]
• Yang LH, Kleinman A, Link BG, Phelan JC, Lee S, Good B. Culture and stigma: Adding moral feel to stigma theory. Social Science & Medicine. 2007;64:1524–1535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

sorrelsfrotte.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248273/

Share this post